Terms & Conditions

Privacy Policy

Shipping, Delivery & Return Policy

Hardware Limited Warranty Policy

Quality & Information Security Policy

Vulnerability Disclosure Policy

EU Projects

Vulnerability Disclosure Policy


 

Effective date: August 11, 2026
 
1. Introduction 
 
At OBDeleven, security is a fundamental element of our products, services and business operations. As a provider of connected automotive diagnostic solutions, mobile applications, cloud services and vehicle communication technologies, we recognize that maintaining the confidentiality, integrity, availability and resilience of our systems is essential for protecting our customers, partners, employees and the wider automotive ecosystem. 
 
Cybersecurity is a shared responsibility. While OBDeleven continuously invests in secure software development practices, vulnerability management, infrastructure monitoring, penetration testing and continuous security improvements, independent security researchers also play an important role in identifying vulnerabilities that may otherwise remain undiscovered. 
 
OBDeleven values the work performed by the global cybersecurity research community. Responsible vulnerability reporting contributes significantly to improving the security of digital products and services by enabling organizations to identify, assess, remediate and disclose security vulnerabilities before they can be maliciously exploited. 
 
This Vulnerability Disclosure Policy (the Policy) establishes a structured process through which security researchers may responsibly report suspected security vulnerabilities affecting OBDeleven products and services. It also explains how OBDeleven receives, validates, investigates, remediates and coordinates the disclosure of reported vulnerabilities. 
 
The purpose of this Policy is not only to facilitate effective communication between OBDeleven and security researchers but also to establish clear expectations for responsible security research. By defining mutual responsibilities, reporting procedures, communication channels and disclosure principles, this Policy seeks to foster a transparent, collaborative and constructive relationship between OBDeleven and the security research community. 
 
This Policy has been developed in accordance with internationally recognized cybersecurity practices and is aligned with the principles of Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure (CVD) promoted by the European Union Agency for Cybersecurity (ENISA), the NIS Cooperation Group Guidelines on Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure, ISO/IEC 29147 (Vulnerability Disclosure), ISO/IEC 30111 (Vulnerability Handling Processes) and other recognized cybersecurity standards and best practices. 
 
2. Purpose 
 
The primary purpose of this Policy is to establish a clear, transparent and responsible framework for reporting and handling security vulnerabilities affecting OBDeleven products, services and supporting infrastructure. 
 
Through this Policy, OBDeleven aims to encourage the responsible disclosure of vulnerabilities while minimizing potential risks to customers, business operations and third parties. Early identification and remediation of vulnerabilities are essential components of an effective cybersecurity risk management program and contribute to the resilience of connected automotive technologies. 
 
Specifically, this Policy seeks to: 
 
  • encourage independent security research conducted in good faith; 
  • provide security researchers with clearly defined reporting procedures and communication channels; 
  • establish a predictable and transparent vulnerability handling process; 
  • define the responsibilities and expectations of both researchers and OBDeleven; 
  • support coordinated vulnerability disclosure practices that reduce unnecessary cybersecurity risks; 
  • protect customers by ensuring vulnerabilities are investigated and remediated in a timely manner; 
  • facilitate constructive collaboration between OBDeleven and the cybersecurity research community; 
  • support compliance with applicable legal, regulatory and contractual cybersecurity obligations; and 
  • promote continuous improvement of OBDeleven's overall cybersecurity posture. 
 
This Policy does not constitute a bug bounty program and should not be interpreted as creating any contractual entitlement to financial compensation or other rewards. Any recognition offered by OBDeleven for reported vulnerabilities remains entirely at the discretion of the company and will be described separately where applicable. 
 
3. Objectives 
 
The objectives of this Policy are to establish a coordinated vulnerability disclosure process that enables security vulnerabilities to be identified, assessed, remediated and disclosed in a manner that protects customers, supports responsible security research and minimizes cybersecurity risk. 
 
In pursuing these objectives, OBDeleven is committed to the following principles: 
 
3.1. Protection of Customers 
 
The protection of our customers remains our highest priority. Vulnerability handling activities should always seek to reduce the likelihood of unauthorized access, data compromise, service disruption, or other adverse impacts on customers using OBDeleven products and services. 
 
3.2. Responsible Disclosure 
 
Security vulnerabilities should be disclosed responsibly through a coordinated process that provides sufficient time for investigation, validation, remediation, testing and customer communication before public disclosure. 
 
3.3. Collaboration 
 
OBDeleven seeks to establish a constructive and professional relationship with the cybersecurity research community. Effective vulnerability management relies upon timely, respectful and transparent communication between researchers and vendors. 
 
3.4. Transparency 
 
Researchers should understand how vulnerability reports are handled, what information is required, what communication they can expect and how disclosure decisions are made. 
 
3.5. Proportionality 
 
Security testing should always be proportionate to its objective. Researchers should employ the least intrusive testing methods necessary to demonstrate the existence of a vulnerability while minimizing any potential impact on systems, services, or customer information. 
 
3.6. Confidentiality 
 
Information relating to reported vulnerabilities should remain confidential throughout the investigation and remediation process unless coordinated disclosure has been agreed or disclosure is otherwise required by applicable law. 
 
3.7. Continuous Improvement 
 
Every confirmed vulnerability represents an opportunity to improve the security of OBDeleven products, development processes, operational procedures and cybersecurity governance. Lessons learned through vulnerability handling activities contribute to strengthening the organization's overall security posture. 
 
4. Scope 
 
This Policy applies to security vulnerabilities affecting information systems, software, hardware, cloud services and digital assets that are owned, developed, operated, or managed by OBDeleven. 
 
The scope has been defined to provide researchers with clarity regarding which systems may be tested under this Policy and to ensure that security research is conducted in an authorized and controlled manner. 
 
Unless otherwise stated, the following categories of assets are considered in scope. 
 
4.1. Websites 
 
This Policy applies to websites owned and operated by OBDeleven, including official corporate websites, customer portals, account management interfaces, documentation websites, support platforms and other publicly accessible web services operated under OBDeleven-controlled domains. 
 
Testing should be limited to vulnerabilities affecting the security of the application or supporting infrastructure and should avoid unnecessary interaction with customer accounts or personal information. 
 
4.2. Mobile Applications 
 
The Policy applies to official OBDeleven mobile applications distributed through authorized application stores, including Android and iOS applications, together with associated application programming interfaces (APIs), authentication mechanisms and backend services supporting those applications. 
 
Researchers are encouraged to evaluate the security of mobile applications using non-production accounts whenever possible. 
 
4.3. Cloud Services 
 
This Policy applies to cloud-hosted services operated by or on behalf of OBDeleven, including customer account services, authentication services, data processing services, cloud APIs, backend infrastructure and other hosted environments supporting OBDeleven products. 
 
Testing activities must avoid degrading the availability or performance of production environments. 
 
4.4. Connected Vehicle Services 
 
OBDeleven develops products that communicate with supported vehicles through diagnostic interfaces and cloud-connected services. 
 
Research involving connected vehicle functionality must be conducted in a controlled environment using vehicles, devices and equipment that the researcher is authorized to access. Under no circumstances should testing create risks to road users, vehicle safety, or third-party property. 
 
Researchers must never conduct testing on vehicles while they are in operation or otherwise compromise the safety, reliability, or lawful operation of a vehicle. 
 
4.5. Hardware Devices 
 
This Policy applies to official OBDeleven hardware devices, including diagnostic adapters, communication modules, firmware and supporting software components developed or distributed by OBDeleven. 
 
Testing involving firmware modifications should be conducted responsibly and should not interfere with production infrastructure or services. 
 
4.6. APIs 
 
Official APIs developed and operated by OBDeleven are within the scope of this Policy, including authenticated and unauthenticated interfaces intended for customer use or integration with supported services. 
 
Researchers should limit requests to those necessary to demonstrate a vulnerability and should avoid excessive automated requests that could affect service availability. 
 
4.7. Supporting Infrastructure 
 
Where vulnerabilities relate directly to infrastructure operated by OBDeleven, including authentication systems, identity management services, networking components, cloud infrastructure, logging services, or administrative interfaces, such vulnerabilities may also fall within the scope of this Policy, provided testing complies with all requirements set forth herein. 
 
4.8. Third-Party Services 
 
Certain OBDeleven products and services rely upon third-party technologies, cloud providers, open-source software, payment processors, analytics platforms, communication services, or other externally managed systems. 
 
Unless OBDeleven expressly authorizes otherwise, third-party systems that are not owned or operated by OBDeleven are outside the scope of this Policy. 
 
If a researcher believes that a vulnerability affecting a third-party component also impacts OBDeleven products or services, the vulnerability should be reported to OBDeleven. Where appropriate, OBDeleven will coordinate disclosure with the affected third party in accordance with established coordinated vulnerability disclosure practices. This approach reflects ENISA's recommendation that vendors support multi-party coordination where upstream or downstream dependencies are affected. 
 
5. Good Faith Security Research 
 
OBDeleven recognizes that independent security research is an important component of modern cybersecurity and contributes significantly to the identification and remediation of vulnerabilities before they can be maliciously exploited. We therefore encourage responsible security research conducted in good faith and in accordance with this Policy. 
 
For the purposes of this Policy, good faith security research means security testing undertaken solely for the purpose of identifying, verifying and responsibly reporting vulnerabilities affecting products, services, systems, or infrastructure owned or operated by OBDeleven. Such research must be performed with the intention of improving security and without any intention to exploit identified vulnerabilities for personal benefit, commercial advantage, competitive gain, or malicious purposes. 
Good faith research requires that security testing be conducted responsibly, ethically and proportionately. Researchers are expected to respect the security and privacy of OBDeleven customers, employees, partners and third parties throughout the research process. Any interaction with production systems should be limited to what is reasonably necessary to verify the existence of a suspected vulnerability. 
 
Researchers conducting security testing under this Policy should: 
 
  • act honestly, professionally and ethically throughout the research process; 
  • avoid actions that unnecessarily affect the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of OBDeleven systems; 
  • immediately report confirmed vulnerabilities through the reporting mechanisms described in this Policy; 
  • refrain from exploiting vulnerabilities beyond the minimum extent necessary to demonstrate their existence; 
  • cooperate with OBDeleven during the investigation and remediation process; 
  • maintain confidentiality regarding discovered vulnerabilities until coordinated disclosure has been agreed. 
 
Good faith research does not include activities intended to obtain unauthorized financial benefit, gain access to confidential business information, disrupt services, compromise customer accounts, interfere with vehicle operation, or otherwise cause harm to OBDeleven or any third party. 
 
Researchers should recognize that vulnerabilities may exist within complex systems involving customers, suppliers, cloud providers, open-source software and other third parties. Research should therefore be conducted with particular care to avoid unintended impacts on organizations beyond OBDeleven. 
 
OBDeleven appreciates that independent researchers often invest significant time and expertise in identifying security issues. This Policy seeks to provide a predictable framework that encourages constructive collaboration while protecting customers and maintaining the security and stability of production services. 
 
6. Safe Harbor 
 
OBDeleven is committed to fostering a constructive relationship with the cybersecurity research community. We recognize that responsible vulnerability disclosure depends upon researchers having confidence that legitimate security research conducted in accordance with published rules will be treated appropriately. 
 
Accordingly, subject to compliance with this Policy, OBDeleven considers security testing performed within the defined scope of this Policy to constitute authorized security research. 
 
Where researchers conduct their activities in accordance with this Policy, OBDeleven will not intentionally initiate civil legal proceedings solely on the basis of security research undertaken pursuant to this Policy. Furthermore, where appropriate and legally permissible, OBDeleven may communicate to relevant authorities or third parties that the research was conducted under an authorized vulnerability disclosure process. 
 
This Safe Harbor applies only where researchers: 
 
  • comply with the scope defined by this Policy; 
  • conduct testing in good faith; 
  • avoid causing unnecessary disruption to systems or services; 
  • refrain from intentionally accessing, modifying, or disclosing customer information except where such access is unavoidable and strictly necessary to demonstrate a vulnerability; 
  • immediately discontinue testing once sufficient evidence has been obtained; 
  • report vulnerabilities promptly; 
  • maintain the confidentiality of vulnerability information until coordinated disclosure has been agreed; and 
  • cooperate reasonably with OBDeleven throughout the vulnerability handling process. 
 
The Safe Harbor does not extend to activities that: 
 
  • intentionally compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of systems; 
  • involve extortion, coercion, or demands for payment outside any published reward program; 
  • involve the deployment of malware, ransomware, or other malicious software; 
  • intentionally compromise customer accounts or personal information; 
  • involve persistent unauthorized access to systems; 
  • attempt to evade detection or conceal malicious activities; 
  • violate applicable criminal, civil, regulatory, or contractual obligations. 
 
Nothing in this Policy authorizes activities that exceed the limits established herein. Researchers remain responsible for ensuring that their activities comply with all applicable laws and regulations within the jurisdictions in which they operate. 
Similarly, nothing in this Policy obliges OBDeleven to waive any legal rights with respect to activities that fall outside the scope of authorized security research or that demonstrate malicious intent. 
 
7. Rules of Engagement 
 
Security research conducted under this Policy should always seek to minimize operational impact while obtaining sufficient technical evidence to enable OBDeleven to reproduce and remediate the reported vulnerability. 
 
Researchers are expected to apply the principle of least intrusive testing, meaning that testing activities should be carefully planned to reduce risks to production systems, customer data, connected vehicles and supporting infrastructure. 
 
7.1. Proportionality 
 
Researchers should use the minimum level of interaction necessary to verify the existence of a vulnerability. 
 
If a vulnerability has been successfully demonstrated using a limited proof of concept, researchers should not continue attempting additional exploitation merely to obtain further evidence. 
 
Examples include: 
 
  • demonstrating the existence of an SQL Injection vulnerability without extracting entire databases; 
  • verifying arbitrary file access without downloading confidential files; 
  • confirming remote code execution without deploying persistent software; 
  • demonstrating privilege escalation without creating unnecessary administrator accounts. 
 
Researchers should always ask themselves whether an additional testing step is necessary to prove the vulnerability. If the answer is no, the activity should not be performed. 
 
7.2. Protection of Availability 
 
OBDeleven provides products and services used by customers in daily vehicle diagnostics and related operations. The availability of these services is therefore an important security objective. 
 
Researchers must avoid any activity that could reasonably be expected to interrupt, degrade, overload, or otherwise negatively affect the availability or performance of production services. 
 
Examples include: 
 
  • excessive automated scanning; 
  • high-volume API requests; 
  • stress testing; 
  • denial-of-service testing; 
  • resource exhaustion attacks; 
  • intentionally generating excessive logging or monitoring events. 
 
Where there is uncertainty regarding whether a proposed testing methodology may affect service availability, researchers should contact OBDeleven before proceeding. 
 
7.3. Protection of Confidential Information 
 
Researchers should avoid accessing confidential information whenever reasonably possible. 
 
If confidential information is encountered unintentionally, researchers should: 
 
  • immediately cease further access; 
  • avoid copying or sharing the information; 
  • securely protect any information temporarily retained; 
  • report the circumstances to OBDeleven as part of the vulnerability report; 
  • permanently delete the information once it is no longer required for the reporting process. 
 
Researchers must not publicly disclose, publish, or otherwise use confidential information obtained during testing. 
 
7.4. Respect for Customer Accounts 
 
Researchers should use their own accounts whenever authentication is required. 
 
Researchers must not intentionally access customer accounts, employee accounts, partner environments, or supplier systems unless explicit authorization has been obtained from the account owner or from OBDeleven. 
 
Where account takeover vulnerabilities are suspected, researchers should limit testing to accounts they own or have been expressly authorized to use. 
 
7.5. Safety of Connected Vehicles 
 
Given the nature of OBDeleven products, particular care must be taken when conducting security research involving vehicle communication. 
 
Researchers must never perform testing that could: 
 
  • affect the safe operation of a vehicle; 
  • interfere with braking, steering, acceleration, or safety systems; 
  • endanger drivers, passengers, pedestrians, or other road users; 
  • interfere with emergency services; 
  • compromise vehicles owned by third parties without authorization. 
 
Security testing involving vehicles should be performed only under controlled conditions using vehicles and equipment that the researcher is authorized to access. 
 
8. Prohibited Activities 
 
To protect customers, production systems, employees and third parties, certain activities are expressly prohibited under this Policy. 
 
The following list is intended to provide clarity regarding activities that fall outside authorized security research. It is not exhaustive and OBDeleven may determine that other activities are similarly inconsistent with the principles of this Policy. 
 
Researchers must not: 
 
Service Disruption 
 
  • perform denial-of-service (DoS) or distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) testing; 
  • intentionally degrade system performance; 
  • overload production infrastructure; 
  • perform stress testing without prior written authorization; 
  • intentionally interfere with monitoring, logging, or alerting systems. 
 
Unauthorized Data Access 
 
  • intentionally access customer information beyond what is necessary to demonstrate a vulnerability; 
  • extract, download, copy, or retain production databases; 
  • modify or delete customer information; 
  • alter transaction records; 
  • manipulate customer subscriptions or licensing information. 
 
Malicious Activities 
 
  • deploy malware, ransomware, spyware, worms, or other malicious software; 
  • establish persistent access; 
  • install backdoors; 
  • create unauthorized administrator accounts; 
  • conceal testing activities through malicious means; 
  • bypass security monitoring for purposes unrelated to demonstrating a vulnerability. 
 
Social Engineering 
 
  • phishing; 
  • impersonation of employees; 
  • fraudulent telephone calls; 
  • fraudulent SMS messages; 
  • fraudulent email campaigns; 
  • attempts to obtain credentials through deception. 
 
Physical Security 
 
  • unauthorized physical access to OBDeleven facilities; 
  • tampering with hardware deployed by customers; 
  • theft of equipment; 
  • bypassing physical access controls. 
 
Attacks Against Third Parties 
 
Researchers must not conduct testing against suppliers, cloud providers, payment processors, telecommunications providers, or other third-party organizations solely because they provide services to OBDeleven. 
 
Any vulnerabilities affecting third-party products should be reported to OBDeleven where they impact OBDeleven services. OBDeleven will coordinate with the relevant vendor as appropriate. 
 
Extortion 
 
Researchers must never: 
 
  • demand payment in exchange for withholding disclosure; 
  • threaten public disclosure unless compensation is provided; 
  • attempt to sell vulnerability information; 
  • auction vulnerabilities; 
  • disclose vulnerabilities to unauthorized third parties for commercial gain. 
 
Such conduct is fundamentally incompatible with responsible vulnerability disclosure and may result in legal action. 
 
Vehicle Safety 
 
Researchers must never intentionally compromise the safe operation of vehicles or create situations that could endanger human life. 
 
Any vulnerability that presents an immediate safety risk should be reported to OBDeleven without delay and researchers should refrain from further testing unless expressly requested by OBDeleven. 
 
9. Confidentiality 
 
9.1. General Principles 
 
Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure is founded on mutual trust, responsible communication and the timely exchange of information between security researchers and affected organizations. Maintaining confidentiality throughout the vulnerability handling process is essential to reducing the risk that a reported vulnerability may be exploited before appropriate mitigations or corrective measures have been implemented. 
 
Accordingly, both OBDeleven and researchers are expected to treat information relating to newly discovered vulnerabilities as confidential until a coordinated disclosure strategy has been agreed or public disclosure is otherwise considered appropriate. 
 
Confidentiality serves several important objectives, including: 
 
  • protecting customers from premature exposure to unremediated vulnerabilities; 
  • providing sufficient time for technical investigation and remediation; 
  • enabling coordination with affected suppliers, partners and third parties; 
  • supporting responsible public communication; and 
  • reducing the likelihood of malicious exploitation during the remediation process. 
 
Nothing in this Policy is intended to discourage responsible academic research or legitimate public discussion of cybersecurity issues. Rather, it establishes a process through which vulnerability-specific information can be communicated in a manner that balances transparency with customer protection. 
 
9.2. Confidentiality Obligations of Researchers 
 
Researchers submitting Vulnerability Reports under this Policy are expected to maintain the confidentiality of all information relating to the reported vulnerability until coordinated disclosure has been agreed with OBDeleven. 
 
In particular, researchers should refrain from: 
 
  • publishing technical details that would enable exploitation; 
  • sharing proof-of-concept exploit code publicly; 
  • disclosing affected systems through blogs, presentations, conferences, or social media; 
  • notifying media organizations before coordinated disclosure has been completed; 
  • disclosing customer information encountered during testing; 
  • providing vulnerability details to unauthorized third parties. 
 
Where a researcher believes that public disclosure should occur sooner than originally anticipated, they are encouraged to discuss the matter with OBDeleven before taking any action. OBDeleven is committed to maintaining an open dialogue regarding disclosure timelines and will seek to reach a mutually acceptable outcome wherever reasonably possible. 
 
9.3. Confidentiality Commitments by OBDeleven 
 
OBDeleven recognizes that researchers often wish to remain anonymous or otherwise protect their identity. 
 
Unless the researcher has expressly consented, OBDeleven will not intentionally disclose: 
 
  • the identity of the researcher; 
  • contact information provided during reporting; 
  • unpublished technical materials supplied by the researcher; 
  • proof-of-concept code; 
  • supporting evidence; 
  • internal communications relating to the report. 
 
Information provided by researchers will be shared internally only with those personnel, contractors, or trusted third parties who require access for the purposes of investigating, validating, remediating, coordinating, or managing the reported vulnerability. 
 
Where coordination with suppliers, software vendors, cloud providers, component manufacturers, or national Computer Security Incident Response Teams (CSIRTs) is necessary, OBDeleven may share relevant technical information on a need-to-know basis while taking reasonable measures to preserve confidentiality. 
 
9.4. Public Disclosure 
 
OBDeleven believes that public disclosure of vulnerabilities contributes to improving cybersecurity by increasing transparency, encouraging remediation and enabling customers to make informed decisions regarding risk. 
 
However, disclosure should occur only after careful consideration of several factors, including: 
 
  • the availability of a remediation or mitigation; 
  • the severity of the vulnerability; 
  • the likelihood of active exploitation; 
  • customer readiness to deploy updates; 
  • dependencies affecting third-party suppliers; 
  • public interest considerations. 
 
Researchers are encouraged to coordinate publication with OBDeleven wherever reasonably possible. 
 
10. Protection of Personal Data 
 
10.1. Commitment to Privacy 
 
OBDeleven is committed to protecting personal data and respecting the privacy rights of customers, employees, business partners and researchers. 
 
Security research conducted under this Policy should always be designed to minimize any interaction with personal data. Researchers should avoid intentionally accessing, collecting, processing, or retaining personal data unless such access is unavoidable for the sole purpose of demonstrating a vulnerability. 
 
The existence of personal data within a system does not authorize unrestricted access to that information. 
 
10.2. Data Minimization 
 
Researchers should adhere to the principle of data minimization throughout the testing process. 
 
Where personal data is encountered unintentionally, researchers should: 
 
  • cease further access once sufficient evidence has been obtained; 
  • avoid browsing additional records; 
  • refrain from downloading entire datasets; 
  • collect only the minimum evidence necessary to demonstrate the vulnerability; 
  • securely protect any temporary evidence retained for reporting purposes. 
 
Examples of appropriate evidence include: 
 
  • partially redacted screenshots; 
  • sanitized HTTP responses; 
  • excerpts of log files with personal information removed; 
  • technical descriptions of observed behavior. 
 
Researchers should avoid retaining copies of production databases, customer files, authentication credentials, or other information that is not strictly required to support the Vulnerability Report. 
 
10.3. Accidental Access to Personal Data 
 
If personal data is accessed unintentionally during security research, the researcher should notify OBDeleven as part of the Vulnerability Report and provide sufficient information to enable an appropriate assessment of the incident. 
 
Researchers should not: 
 
  • disclose the personal data to third parties; 
  • publish the personal data; 
  • retain the personal data longer than necessary; 
  • use the personal data for any purpose unrelated to vulnerability reporting. 
 
OBDeleven may request additional information where necessary to assess any associated privacy risks or regulatory obligations. 
 
10.4. Handling of Researcher Information 
 
Information provided by researchers during the reporting process will be processed solely for the purposes of: 
 
  • communicating regarding the reported vulnerability; 
  • coordinating remediation and disclosure; 
  • maintaining vulnerability management records; 
  • recognizing researchers, where applicable and with their consent; and 
  • complying with applicable legal and regulatory obligations. 
 
Further information regarding the processing of personal data is available in the OBDeleven Privacy Policy. 
 
11. Secure Communications 
 
11.1. Reporting Channels 
 
OBDeleven encourages researchers to submit Vulnerability Reports through the official reporting channels published on the OBDeleven website. 
 
The reporting channel is: 
 
Where additional secure reporting mechanisms are made available, researchers are encouraged to use the method most appropriate to the sensitivity of the information being transmitted. 
 
11.2. Encryption 
 
Researchers reporting vulnerabilities that include sensitive technical information, proof-of-concept code, credentials, memory dumps, or other confidential materials are strongly encouraged to encrypt their communications. 
 
OBDeleven intends to publish a public PGP key to facilitate encrypted reporting. Information regarding the public key will be made available through the official website and the organization's security.txt file. 
Where encrypted communications are used, researchers should include sufficient contact information to enable OBDeleven to respond securely. 
 
11.3. Security of Supporting Materials 
 
Supporting documentation such as screenshots, logs, packet captures, source code snippets, or proof-of-concept demonstrations should be transmitted using secure methods. 
 
Researchers should ensure that submitted materials do not unnecessarily expose customer information, authentication credentials, cryptographic secrets, or unrelated confidential information. 
 
12. Reporting a Vulnerability 
 
12.1. General Reporting Expectations 
 
Researchers who believe they have identified a security vulnerability affecting an OBDeleven product or service are encouraged to report the issue as soon as reasonably practicable. 
 
Prompt reporting enables OBDeleven to begin technical validation, assess potential customer impact, coordinate remediation activities and reduce the risk of malicious exploitation. 
 
Researchers are not expected to perform extensive exploitation before submitting a report. In many cases, demonstrating the existence of a vulnerability is sufficient. 
 
12.2. Acknowledgement of Reports 
 
OBDeleven aims to acknowledge receipt of Vulnerability Reports within 3 (three) business days. 
 
Acknowledgement confirms only that the report has been received. It should not be interpreted as confirmation that the reported issue constitutes a security vulnerability. 
 
12.3. Validation 
 
Following acknowledgement, the Information Security team will review the submitted information to determine whether: 
 
  • sufficient information has been provided; 
  • the issue falls within the scope of this Policy; 
  • the issue can be reproduced; 
  • the reported behavior constitutes a security vulnerability. 
 
Where additional information is required, researchers may be contacted to provide clarification or supplementary evidence. 
 
12.4. Ongoing Communication 
 
OBDeleven values open and respectful communication with researchers. 
 
Throughout the investigation process, researchers may receive updates regarding: 
 
  • validation status; 
  • remediation progress; 
  • disclosure planning; 
  • requests for clarification; 
  • expected timelines. 
 
While specific technical details or internal decision-making processes may not always be disclosed, OBDeleven will seek to provide meaningful status updates whenever reasonably possible. 
 
13. Information Required in Vulnerability Reports 
 
To facilitate efficient assessment and remediation, Vulnerability Reports should include, where available: 
 
Reporter Information 
 
  • name or preferred pseudonym; 
  • preferred contact information; 
  • organization (if applicable); 
  • public key (if encrypted communication is requested). 
 
Affected Asset 
 
  • product name; 
  • service name; 
  • application; 
  • firmware version; 
  • hardware model; 
  • API endpoint; 
  • URL; 
  • software version. 
 
Vulnerability Description 
 
  • clear description of the vulnerability; 
  • affected functionality; 
  • expected behavior; 
  • observed behavior. 
 
Technical Information 
 
  • detailed reproduction steps; 
  • proof-of-concept code (where appropriate); 
  • screenshots; 
  • screen recordings; 
  • logs; 
  • HTTP requests and responses; 
  • packet captures; 
  • error messages. 
 
Security Assessment 
 
Where known, researchers are encouraged, but not required, to include: 
 
  • estimated security impact; 
  • potential attack scenarios; 
  • CVSS Base Score; 
  • relevant CWE classification; 
  • suggested remediation or mitigation. 
 
Researchers are not expected to provide a complete security analysis before submitting a report. Reports submitted with partial information are welcome where they contain sufficient evidence to enable technical investigation. 
 
Additional Information 
 
Researchers should also indicate: 
 
  • whether the vulnerability has been disclosed elsewhere; 
  • whether a CVE identifier has already been requested; 
  • whether any third parties may also be affected; 
  • whether active exploitation has been observed. 
 
Providing comprehensive information significantly improves the efficiency of the vulnerability handling process and helps reduce the need for additional clarification requests. 
 
14. Vulnerability Handling Process 
 
14.1. General Principles 
 
OBDeleven maintains a structured Vulnerability Handling Process designed to ensure that reported vulnerabilities are assessed, prioritized, remediated, and disclosed in a consistent, transparent, and risk-based manner. 
 
Each Vulnerability Report received under this Policy is evaluated individually. While the process followed may vary depending on the nature and complexity of the reported issue, OBDeleven seeks to apply consistent principles to all reports, including fairness, transparency, proportionality, and timely communication. 
 
The objectives of the Vulnerability Handling Process are to: 
 
  • validate the reported vulnerability; 
  • assess its potential impact on OBDeleven products, services, and customers; 
  • determine appropriate remediation measures; 
  • coordinate remediation activities across internal teams and external stakeholders where necessary; 
  • communicate appropriately with the reporting researcher; 
  • support coordinated public disclosure once remediation has been completed or appropriate mitigations are available. 
 
14.2. Receipt of Vulnerability Reports 
 
Upon receipt of a Vulnerability Report, OBDeleven will perform an initial administrative review to verify that: 
  • the report has been submitted through an approved reporting channel; 
  • sufficient information has been provided to begin technical assessment; 
  • the reported issue appears to relate to an asset within the scope of this Policy; 
  • the report does not constitute spam or clearly abusive content. 
 
Where the report contains insufficient information to enable validation, OBDeleven may request additional technical details or clarification from the researcher. 
 
14.3. Validation 
 
The Information Security team will review the submitted information to determine whether the reported behavior constitutes a legitimate security vulnerability. 
 
Validation activities may include: 
 
  • reproducing the reported issue in a controlled environment; 
  • reviewing supporting evidence; 
  • consulting development, infrastructure, product, or quality assurance teams; 
  • assessing exploitability; 
  • determining whether the reported issue has already been identified internally or reported by another party. 
 
Reports that cannot be reproduced are not automatically considered invalid. OBDeleven may work collaboratively with the researcher to clarify reproduction steps or obtain additional information. 
 
14.4. Duplicate Reports 
 
Where multiple researchers independently report the same vulnerability, OBDeleven generally recognizes the first report that provided sufficient information to enable validation. 
 
Subsequent duplicate reports remain valuable and may assist in confirming technical details or identifying additional impacts. However, duplicate reports do not necessarily result in separate public acknowledgements or recognition. 
 
14.5. Out-of-Scope Reports 
 
If a report concerns systems, products, or services that fall outside the scope of this Policy, OBDeleven will, where reasonably practicable, inform the researcher accordingly. 
 
Where the reported issue affects a third-party supplier but also has implications for OBDeleven products or services, OBDeleven may coordinate with the relevant supplier in accordance with coordinated vulnerability disclosure principles. 
 
15. Vulnerability Assessment 
 
15.1. Risk-Based Assessment 
 
Confirmed vulnerabilities are assessed using a risk-based approach that considers both technical severity and potential business impact. 
 
Factors considered during assessment may include: 
 
  • ease of exploitation; 
  • attack complexity; 
  • required privileges; 
  • user interaction; 
  • confidentiality impact; 
  • integrity impact; 
  • availability impact; 
  • safety implications; 
  • exploit maturity; 
  • likelihood of exploitation; 
  • affected customer population; 
  • potential regulatory implications. 
 
Where appropriate, OBDeleven may use the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) as one input to the overall assessment. CVSS scores are intended to support consistent severity classification but do not replace professional judgement or business context. 
 
15.2. Automotive Safety Considerations 
 
As OBDeleven develops products that interact with vehicle diagnostic systems, certain vulnerabilities may have implications beyond traditional information security. 
 
Where applicable, vulnerability assessments may also consider: 
 
  • potential impact on vehicle operation; 
  • implications for driver or passenger safety; 
  • effects on diagnostic integrity; 
  • interaction with vehicle communication protocols; 
  • potential misuse of diagnostic functionality. 
  • Any vulnerability that could reasonably affect vehicle safety or create risks to individuals will be treated with the highest priority and may require accelerated investigation and remediation. 
 
16. Remediation 
 
Once a vulnerability has been confirmed, OBDeleven will determine the most appropriate remediation strategy. 
 
Remediation activities may include: 
 
  • software updates; 
  • firmware updates; 
  • infrastructure changes; 
  • configuration modifications; 
  • security monitoring improvements; 
  • temporary mitigations; 
  • customer guidance. 
 
Before deployment, corrective measures are generally subject to appropriate quality assurance and security testing to reduce the risk of introducing unintended defects. 
 
OBDeleven recognizes that some vulnerabilities require coordination across multiple products, development teams, suppliers, or release cycles. Consequently, remediation timelines may vary depending on technical complexity, product architecture, and operational considerations. 
 
17. Communication During Investigation 
 
OBDeleven values constructive communication throughout the vulnerability handling process. 
 
Researchers should expect periodic updates regarding the status of confirmed reports, particularly where remediation activities require extended timeframes. 
 
While certain information may remain confidential for security or legal reasons, OBDeleven will endeavour to provide meaningful progress updates at appropriate intervals. 
 
Where circumstances materially affect anticipated disclosure timelines, researchers will be informed where reasonably practicable. 
 
18. Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure 
 
18.1. General Principles 
 
OBDeleven supports Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure (CVD) as the preferred mechanism for communicating security vulnerabilities. 
 
Coordinated disclosure seeks to balance transparency with customer protection by ensuring that affected parties have an opportunity to investigate, remediate, and deploy appropriate security updates before detailed technical information becomes publicly available. 
 
Both OBDeleven and researchers share responsibility for ensuring that disclosure occurs responsibly and in a manner that minimizes unnecessary cybersecurity risks. 
 
18.2. Disclosure Timeline 
 
There is no universally applicable disclosure timeline suitable for every vulnerability. 
 
Disclosure decisions may consider: 
 
  • severity; 
  • exploitability; 
  • evidence of active exploitation; 
  • availability of mitigations; 
  • deployment complexity; 
  • third-party dependencies; 
  • customer impact. 
 
While many vulnerabilities may be suitable for disclosure within approximately ninety (90) days, certain vulnerabilities may justify shorter or longer coordination periods. 
 
18.3. Multi-Party Coordination 
 
Modern software products frequently incorporate third-party software, cloud services, open-source components, communication libraries, hardware platforms, and external suppliers. 
 
Where vulnerabilities affect multiple organizations, OBDeleven may coordinate with: 
 
  • software vendors; 
  • hardware manufacturers; 
  • cloud providers; 
  • suppliers; 
  • open-source maintainers; 
  • national or sectoral CSIRTs; 
  • other affected organizations. 
 
Such coordination seeks to ensure that remediation activities occur in an orderly and responsible manner across the affected ecosystem. 
 
18.4. Public Advisories 
 
Where appropriate, OBDeleven may publish security advisories describing confirmed vulnerabilities. 
 
Security advisories may include: 
 
  • vulnerability summary; 
  • affected products; 
  • affected versions; 
  • severity; 
  • CVE identifier (where applicable); 
  • remediation guidance; 
  • fixed versions; 
  • acknowledgements. 
 
Researchers who wish to receive public recognition may be acknowledged in security advisories, subject to their consent. 
 
18.5. Active Exploitation 
 
Where credible evidence indicates that a vulnerability is being actively exploited, OBDeleven may accelerate disclosure or customer notification to reduce the risk of harm. 
 
In such circumstances, customer protection may require deviation from ordinary disclosure timelines. 
 
19. Recognition of Security Researchers 
 
OBDeleven values the contributions made by the global security research community. 
 
Subject to compliance with this Policy, researchers may be acknowledged through: 
 
  • public security advisories; 
  • a Hall of Fame; 
  • certificates or letters of appreciation; 
  • other forms of non-monetary recognition. 
 
At the time of publication, OBDeleven does not operate a financial bug bounty programme unless expressly stated otherwise on the official website. 
 
20. Legal Notice 
 
This Policy authorizes only those security research activities expressly described herein. 
 
Nothing in this Policy authorizes: 
 
  • unlawful activities; 
  • unauthorized access beyond what is reasonably necessary to demonstrate a vulnerability; 
  • disruption of production services; 
  • access to customer information beyond the minimum necessary; 
  • activities outside the defined scope; 
  • violations of contractual obligations or applicable law. 
 
Researchers remain solely responsible for ensuring that their activities comply with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements. 
 
Nothing in this Policy shall be interpreted as limiting any legal rights available to OBDeleven with respect to activities conducted outside the scope of authorized security research. 
 
21. Policy Governance 
 
This Policy is owned by the OBDeleven Information Security function and is reviewed periodically to ensure continued alignment with: 
 
  • applicable legislation; 
  • industry standards; 
  • technological developments; 
  • organizational changes; 
  • lessons learned through vulnerability handling activities. 
 
OBDeleven may amend this Policy at any time without prior notice. The latest version will always be published on the official OBDeleven website. 
 
22. Contact Information 
 
Security vulnerabilities should be reported through the official reporting channels published by OBDeleven. 
 
Security Contact